Saibaba Guru

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Prisoners’ dilemma
  • Market Efficiency
  • Net monetary assets
  • Negative Correlation
  • Saving Investment

Saibaba Guru

Header Banner

Saibaba Guru

  • Home
  • Prisoners’ dilemma
  • Market Efficiency
  • Net monetary assets
  • Negative Correlation
  • Saving Investment
Market Efficiency
Home›Market Efficiency›Paradox MTB prototype promises near hardtail pedaling efficiency with radical suspension design

Paradox MTB prototype promises near hardtail pedaling efficiency with radical suspension design

By Marian Barnes
January 11, 2022
22
0
Photos and video courtesy of Paradox Suspension.

Editor’s Note: Singletracks does not review crowdfunding projects, and this coverage should not be taken as an endorsement of the seller or the product. Make sure you carefully read and understand the project terms and conditions if you decide to commit or buy. Buyer beware.

There have been a number of full suspension MTB platforms over the years that have seen the lower bracket (BB) mounted in the rear triangle instead of the front. These frame designs have the advantages of reduced pedal movement and increased pedaling efficiency, as pedal force is generated on the same rigid structure that transfers it to the ground, like a hardtail. The disadvantages of these designs can be obvious: with the weight of the rider’s body on the pedals, the rear suspension becomes quite stiff and inefficient. Bryan McFarlan’s Paradox suspension design aims to exploit the benefits of a rear-mounted bottom bracket while avoiding the drawbacks of those previous iterations.

The video above is a rudimentary representation of how McFarlan’s design works, providing the up and forward axle trajectory that high pivot bikes are praised for. In addition, this system would eliminate chain growth since the distance between the BB and the rear axle remains constant. Unlike previous versions of this system, the Paradox cross-link design allows the BB to move in a horizontal plane as the rear axle moves up and down throughout its stroke. The horizontal movement of the BB is believed to avoid rider weight issues over the system while still enjoying the known benefits of a rigid rear and BB connection. What it might feel like to have your feet pulled back with each impact is a question for the prototype phase of this bike.

We had further questions for McFarland regarding mud handling with the intricate linkage that sits right in front of the rear tire, and the level of stiffness the frame designer believes is possible with the stock design. McFarland said the suspension design is the real innovation here and the frame will change dramatically throughout the testing process. It has already redesigned the Paradox frame to include a more traditional down tube after receiving comments and concerns about the frame’s potential stiffness and the amount of force that will be distributed across the links and pivots. Put simply, the bike is a work in progress, and like everyone on Kickstarter, he needs help funding that work.

Paradox Suspension’s Kickstarter goal is to raise $ 94,000 to cover the costs that would allow this framework to market. Click on their Kickstarter page for more details or to add your support.

Related posts:

  1. Community companies market managed to cross $ 95 billion by 2027; World Market Insights Inc.
  2. Centrifugal Pump Market Value $ 48.8 Billion By 2026
  3. Forklift Market Income Anticipated To Attain $ 90 Billion By 2027; World Market Insights Inc.
  4. International Melamine Market business evaluation report by kind, utility, finish use, areas, segments and forecast to 2030 – ResearchAndMarkets.com

Recent Posts

  • Forever Prisoners, by Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
  • Europe Automotive Aluminum Extruded Parts Market Sales
  • Bitcoin Sees Sharp Drop in Its Correlation to Tech Stocks, Kaiko Says
  • Oxytocin spreads cooperation in social networks
  • Blockchain Supply Chain: Market Inside Story – Check which players are focusing on improving operational efficiency

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021

Categories

  • Market Efficiency
  • Negative Correlation
  • Net monetary assets
  • Prisoners' dilemma
  • Saving Investment
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS
  • PRIVACY AND POLICY